You’ve all – by now – seen
video documentaries on 9-11, and an interesting observation in several of
them – in particular the documentary
is the fact that one
of the planes that hit the towers seemed to have some sort of "pod" attached to
its underbelly. The narrator goes to great lengths to try to invalidate the
apparent photographic evidence, but the "pod" can be seen from several angles in
videos taken by several people, and a flash or spark that appeared between the
nose of the plane and the tower could also clearly be seen on separate videos –
and on closer scrutiny by experts, the "flash" or "spark" seems to defy the
explanation that it was caused by a reflection of light, or a static electricity
discharge between the plane and the building. There are also serious questions
whatever it was – that hit the Pentagon, since the lack of landing gear, engines
– objects that would have survived, albeit mangled, or any part of the fuselage
remaining seems to indicate that it was NOT
a Boeing aircraft that hit the building.
now to the facts about WTC 1 & 2:
buildings did not
fall; they were demolished.
Of that there could be no question in an astute observer’s mind after reviewing
the videos taken of the buildings actually disintegrating before our very eyes.
My contention is that even with the use of the most powerful military-grade
explosives available, such a complete destruction could not be accomplished –
even if some "entity" spent months
planting explosives in the buildings, which would be extremely difficult to do
without being observed. Such an operation would have required months of
planning, and more months of work and access to the building’s core columns –
something which would, in my opinion, be next to impossible to do without being
observed, without raising suspicion, and without someone in that "crew" of
criminals coming forward to claim fame and amnesty amid the rising awareness
that 9-11 did not "go down" as the government alleges.
Of course, the
allegation of the use of secret weapons to demolish the towers does not negate
the possibility that whatever was use to bring the towers down was not "helped
along" by conventional demolition techniques, but explosives alone do not
explain the fact that there was very little "rubble"; i.e. pieces of
concrete, remainders of office equipment, or anything bigger than one could hold
in the palm of one’s hand – except for the twisted wreckage of the outer façade
that were the subject of millions of photographs – left in the aftermath.
Particularly curious was the complete lack of even one of the 47 "box" columns –
each made of 4"-thick Japanese steel – left standing. These columns would have
had to have been left standing in order for the attached floors to "rip away"
from them as the news-media popular "pancake" theory (fantasy) proposes.
Conventional military explosives do not pulverize concrete into dust the
consistency of fine talcum powder. Thousands of TONS of reinforced (with
"rebar") concrete were turned to dust in the WTC "collapse", and the top of the
south tower, which tilted briefly (clearly visible in the videos), simply sank
into the cloud of dust in mid-air, and seemed to disappear; to disintegrate much
like a Borg would disintegrate to nothing when hit by a Klingon
"disruptor" weapon on the Sci-Fi series
"Star Trek". We know that these planes (all
4 of them) were NOT continuously tracked by Air Traffic Control, because their
transponders were turned off, and there was ample time to pull a "switch" of the
passenger aircraft with some other aircraft that resembled a commercial jet –
but which carried a secret cargo. Perhaps this seems far-fetched to some of you,
and if it does, I implore you to get my book
"Land of Childhood’s Fears" and read the chapter titled
"Rabbit Trails, Rabbit Trails".
Indeed, this little article could itself be a "rabbit trail", and the modus
operandi of US Government covert operations ensure that the truth – which
oft-times is really stranger than any Sci-Fi imaginable – will be forever
obscured… shades of the JFK assassination.
do we know they’re lying? Simple.
They refuse to show us the "proof" they allegedly have for their bullshit
stories. Case in point: the Pentagon. If a Boeing aircraft
hit the Pentagon, then show us a video – from one of the hundreds of
hi-definition surveillance cameras… and it would even be easy for them to do to
one using the military equivalent of Photoshop or Dreamweaver.
But they won’t show s the video because it doesn’t exist, and all the private
videotapes from surveillance cameras in the area were confiscated by the FBI.
They won’t dare an attempt to fake one, because it would be subjected to
forensic scrutiny that would catch them in a cover-up. If what the government is
telling us is true, then show us the remainder of the aircraft; show us landing
gear, engines…. SOMETHING. They can’t. They can’t because there are no such
things to show, because
what hit the Pentagon was
NOT Flight 77.
We don’t see the
video, we don’t see the remains of an aircraft, and in the photos that we
do have, we
don’t see an impact "footprint" consistent with impact by an airplane because it
was a cruise missile
that hit the Pentagon, and if the American people knew this for a fact; proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, the questions and the righteous outrage would topple
that has become our government in short order.
Just because something is fantastic, does not mean that it is
impossible. Keep in mind that the Atomic bombs that destroyed Hiroshima
and Nagasaki during World War II seemed unbelievable to Americans at
first – but the irrefutable evidence was there. Who
understood the "practical" implications of
before Hiroshima was turned to rubble? Speaking of which – even the buildings in
Hiroshima at "ground zero" were not pulverized to the extent that WTC 1 & 2 were
pulverized. It is apparent to me that a new Paradigm has to be adopted; for what
we saw on 9-11, may not
be what actually
happened. The cover-up, the outright LIES, the affirmations in the face of logic
that defy the physical sciences, the contradictory statements by George Bush,
Condoleezza Rice, Colon
Powell, et al. is proof positive that the truth has not been told.
the examination of any crime scene, Ocam’s
usually leads one to the truth. However, government covert ops routinely operate
in a manner that exploits conventional logic in order to conceal, obfuscate, and
confuse. Multiple layers of deceit are woven in an elaborate design that is
premeditated and "modeled" by a "think tank" of
Hick-Farmer Sigmund Freud
Wannabes practicing what L. Ron Hubbard called
In order to fully understand this concept, you will have to read
The Russian Brainwashing Manual on Psychopolitics,
The Lie Detection Handbook, and
"Land of Childhood’s Fears" – preferably in that order. Based on this
premise, we can construct a scenario which fits the observable facts, and decide
later whether or not it is too fantastic to believe, or too "off-the-wall" to
grant it further consideration. Keeping the following axioms
The Lie Detection Handbook) in mind, let us "speculate".
"The danger with the use of circumstantial evidence
is that of logical gaps; subjective,
links of low probability, or insufficient degree".
People vs. Cleague 22 NY2d 363, 367, 292
"The workability of a postulate is established by the degree to which it
explains existing phenomena [which is] already known; by the degree that it
predicts new phenomena which when looked for, will be found to exist, and by the
degree that it does not require that phenomena which do not exist in fact, be
called into existence for its explanation."
Scientology Logic #19
An alternative scenario:
Let us suppose that the criminals (and
they are criminals) in the US government
who allegedly (obviously) falsified Intelligence reports and planned the 9-11
attacks in order to have an excuse to go to war to be able to control oil
resources in the Middle East, also had a "secret weapon" that they wanted to
test. This weapon, unlike a nuclear bomb, could be targeted to a specific
location, leave very little collateral damage, be undetectable with commercial
equipment, and could be delivered and controlled remotely.
This "weapon", the product of
decades of covert
Top Secret development since the days of
Hiroshima, has the ability to instantly vaporize anything within its operating
The coincidental development of this
weapon with the attendant need to test it, coincided with the opportunity to
invade sovereign countries in order to loot them for their natural resources –
and coincidentally, the occupant of the White House, and his father before him,
happen to be in the OIL business
These factors being true, was the "mother" of the 9-11 plot. With the assistance
of high-level military and Intelligence operatives, and cooperation from Mr.
the plan was carried out.
Two of the four aircraft which were
allegedly "hijacked" by Arab terrorists / Muslim "extremist" (fundamentalist)
suicide bombers (incidentally, seven of which are still alive), were really
taken off course by a little-known but very real technology called "Global
These planes were diverted off course, and perhaps crashed into the ocean
or otherwise disposed of at an unknown location.
In their place were substituted top-secret military aircraft, outfitted to
appear as commercial jets, and also remotely flown by the Global Hawk
technology. The cargo on these two aircraft were two "disruptor" devices
– similar in operation to the weapons of Science Fiction in that whatever energy
they operated on, was able to instantly pulverize concrete and melt steel,
filling the streets of lower Manhattan with fine dust which had the consistency
of talcum powder.
While explosions were heard by several
witnesses who were in the buildings and escaped the collapse, a small number of
demolition charges would have been necessary to ensure that the buildings fell
into their own "footprint" and not topple over onto other real estate.
Conventional explosives would NOT have
vaporized the buildings, and certainly, even a controlled demolition could not
have anticipated and "corrected for" the tilting of the top of the south tower –
even with computer control of the explosive charges. If you remember, the plane
that hit the south tower did NOT hit it
square-on, and as a result, the "energy" of the weapon on board the aircraft was
"off-center". However, the top of the tower as it leaned over threatening to
fall into the street, instead fell into the center of the "disruptor field" of
the weapon below, and its mass was turned to dust before it could fall to the
The video of the south tower falling is
particularly compelling. If you imagine a field of energy; a radius of
heretofore unknown energy existing at the corner of the south tower where the
"plane" impacted the tower; the falling top of the tower – along with all its
steel, concrete, office furniture, heavy machinery, and human beings – fell into
this energy field and failed to emerge at the bottom as steel, concrete, solid
debris, and human remains. Instead, the top of the tower simply disintegrates to
fine dust, and not a piece of it emerges to crash into the street.
Is it possible such a weapon exists in the
US Military arsenal? Was it possible for the Atomic bomb to exist as "The
Manhattan Project", shrouded in the ultimate secrecy and funded covertly by a
taxpayer-supported budget nobody but those who were working on it knew about?
The question implies its own answer. Perhaps what we saw on 9-11 isn’t the
ultimate use for this (admittedly postulated) weapon; perhaps it has another use
entirely. Perhaps what we saw was a demonstration of a device which could be
made much more devastating.
I believe it to be highly unlikely that
some demolition team spent what would had to have been months setting charges
and wiring them together to a computer-controlled detonator – at least I don’t
believe people in general are so "lost-in-the-fog" of their own little worlds
that they wouldn’t have observed such activity over the length of time
necessarily required to set explosives, and become suspicious. Since the more I
think about it, the more I believe conventional explosives
could have been planted, the time required
to do it leaves me to ponder Ocam’s Razor.
Although the explanation itself is simple, it requires a leap of faith to
believe that some heretofore unknown type of weapon or "force" was used to bring
down the WTC towers, because the complete pulverization of the concrete and
practically all of the building’s contents would NOT
be the expected result of a conventional demolition with explosives. Yes, the
building’s fall exhibited at least TEN of the telltale signs of a "controlled
demolition", and that, I believe is coincidental to the proposed operation of
this "disruptor" device / weapon. It is possible that as the device was
triggered, it instantly pulverized whatever was in its narrow field of range.
Imagine the "force" as a field of energy radiating out horizontally from the
weapon’s core in a narrow horizontal band just a few feet thick. Everything
caught in that "field", or that fell into the field, would disintegrate
more-or-less instantly once the device was activated. This would explain the
simultaneous severing of all 47 "box" columns in the core of the building that
would be required to have the buildings fall straight down. At the same time,
the "force field" is also "eating away" at the floor beneath it, and thus the
"device" is falling through the solid matter of the building, turning it to dust
as it falls.
Concrete and steel instantly turned to
dust via some "nuclear" technology that (perhaps) causes molecular bonds to
disintegrate would pave the way for the top of the building to fall away (and
fall into the now falling device’s "force field", and the cumulative effect of
such a thing would appear to the naked eye (and to the cameras filming it) to be
a "pancake" demolition, not much different from a conventional professional
demolition. The use of such a device – if it indeed exists – would negate the
need to plan a demolition, or the time required and the risk of discovery taken
to meticulously plant the required number of cutting and "shape" charges on the
If all of this speculation is true, I have
not a clue what it means. I simply am postulating a scenario which fits the
available evidence. Certainly, my speculation here is no more fantastic, and no
more difficult to believe that 19 hijackers took over 4 planes with box-cutters,
and six of the hijackers obviously survived, since they have subsequently
surfaced alive and well. Perhaps the latter is due to re-incarnation or
something. Tell you what – if I were a passenger aboard one of those planes and
a hijacker brandished a box-cutter, when the plane landed, the prison ward
hospital would have the unenviable task of surgically removing that box-cutter
from his anus. How likely is this scenario? You be the judge. How much evidence
would it take to convince you? If you believe the government’s "conspiracy
theory" then obviously it doesn’t take much to convince you.
order to believe a lie, one first has to stop believing the truth; and once you
stop believing the truth, it is possible that you will believe anything".
The problem with 9-11 is that there is no
objective "truth" to be known. All we know is what we saw with our eyes, and
although the effect was observable, the cause remains unknown, and unless the
American people rise up and demand the truth be told, like the JFK
assassination, we will never know the truth. We will continue to be a nation in
denial, living with the belief that we are the government, when nothing could be
further from the truth. The American people, living their lives vicariously
through sports heroes, celebrities, and soap-operas have ended up with the
government they deserve.
ARCHITECTS and Engineers FOR 9-11 TRUTH
The WTC and
building 7 (which fell at 5:45PM on 9-11-01) were brought down by controlled
demolitions. View the empirical evidence and read the opinion of architectural